Every one of us has quoted a healing rate. In clinic, in a grant, in a talk, in a conversation with a patient sitting on the exam table asking the only question that matters: will this close? Most of those quoted numbers came from the control arms of industry trials, which is a bit like... Continue Reading →
The Census and the Core Sample: #STEADY, DARE-DiaFoot, and How We #MeasureWhatWeManage in the #DiabeticFoot
Two diabetic foot data engines published the same day on two continents. STEADY (US) is a 5,000-patient, AI-enabled real-world registry; DARE-DiaFoot (Italy) is a deep, multi-instrumental phenotyping protocol that quietly studies remission. One is the census, the other the core sample. Together with EURODIALE, the U.S. Wound Registry, and the National Diabetes Foot Care Audit, they sketch a blueprint for finally measuring what we manage.
American Life in Realtime: a benchmark registry of health data for equitable precision health @USC @ResearchatUSC @KeckSchool_USC @SchaefferCenter @NatureMedicine
This work from our SALSAmiga Ritika Chaturvedi and coworkers is, without question, planting a flag in the ground for precision health and equity. Social, structural and environmental determinants of health, such as food or housing insecurity, systemic racism or chronic stress, account for 60–80% of the modifiable risk of disparities in marginalized populations1,2. Such determinants... Continue Reading →
Incidence, hospitalization and mortality and their changes over time in people with a first ever diabetic foot ulcer
Important work from the UK's Primary Care Database suggests that the incidence of diabetic foot ulcers, hospitalizations and mortality appears to have reduced over the past decade in people with type 2 diabetes. Aims: A diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a severe condition associated with morbidity and mortality. Population-based studies are rare and limited by... Continue Reading →