Delivering Equitable Access to Diabetes Foot Care Services #ActAgainstAmputation #DiabeticFoot

In the face of a rapidly growing global diabetes epidemic, equitable access to foot care services remains a critical issue. The editorial “Delivering Equitable Access to Diabetes Foot Care Services” in the European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery highlights the significant challenges and disparities in the management of diabetes-related foot disease (DFD) worldwide.

The Scope of the Problem

Diabetes affects an estimated 537 million people globally, with projections indicating nearly a 50% increase by 2045. Up to 34% of these individuals will develop diabetes-related foot ulcers (DFUs) in their lifetime, and many will face the possibility of amputation. Despite best practice care significantly reducing amputation risk, outcomes for DFU and amputation vary widely across different regions due to intersecting inequalities in socioeconomic, geographical, and cultural factors.

Inequities in High-Income vs. Low-Income Countries

While the majority of diabetes cases are in low and middle-income countries, where access to DFD prevention and management services is limited, disparities also exist in high-income nations. Socioeconomic deprivation, poor health literacy, geographic isolation, and language barriers contribute to late presentations and poor outcomes. In wealthy countries, such as the USA, UK, and Australia, the remoteness of location and socioeconomic deprivation are linked to higher amputation risks. Racism also plays a significant role, with African American patients, for example, facing a much higher likelihood of amputation than their White counterparts, even when accounting for income and other variables.

Indigenous and Minority Populations

Indigenous populations face some of the most severe health disparities. In Australia, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples experience amputation rates up to 38 times higher than non-Indigenous Australians. Similarly, Indigenous populations in Canada, New Zealand, and Norway exhibit higher rates of diabetes and related complications. These disparities are rooted in historical and ongoing impacts of colonization, including systematic racism, socioeconomic disadvantage, and political exclusion.

Towards Equitable Care

The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples emphasizes the need for healthcare that is culturally safe and free from discrimination. Implementing culturally safe practices, involving First Nations-led service delivery models, and training healthcare providers to recognize and address biases are crucial steps toward equitable healthcare.

Multifaceted Solutions

Addressing these disparities requires intersectoral collaboration and multidisciplinary healthcare solutions. Technologies such as artificial intelligence and remote foot monitoring can enhance workforce capacity and improve access to care. Additionally, guidelines for DFD prevention and management must be feasible across diverse settings, supporting both advanced care in well-resourced countries and basic prevention and management in resource-poor regions.

The editorial underscores the need for a global commitment to improving access to effective DFD care, tailored to the diverse needs of populations worldwide.

For a comprehensive understanding, you can read the full editorial here.

References

1. Armstrong DG, Boulton AJM, Bus SA. Diabetic foot ulcers and their recurrence. N Engl J Med 2017;376:2367–75.
2. Sun H, Saeedi P, Karuranga S, et al. IDF diabetes atlas: global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2022;183:109119.
3. Abbas ZG. Managing the diabetic foot in resource-poor settings: challenges and solutions. Chronic Wound Care Manag Res 2017;2017:135–42.
4. Durazzo TS, Frencher S, Gusberg R. Influence of race on the management of lower extremity ischemia: revascularization vs amputation. JAMA Surg 2013;148:617–23.
5. Tan T-W, Shih C-D, Concha-Moore KC, et al. Disparities in outcomes of patients admitted with diabetic foot infections. PLoS One 2019;14:e0211481.
6. West M, Chuter V, Munteanu S, Hawke F. Defining the gap: a systematic review of the difference in rates of diabetes-related foot complications in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians and non-Indigenous Australians. J Foot Ankle Res 2017;10:1–10.
7. Anderson I, Robson B, Connolly M, et al. Indigenous and tribal peoples’ health (The Lancet–Lowitja Institute Global Collaboration): a population study. Lancet 2016;388:131–57.
8. Naseribafrouei A, Eliassen B-M, Melhus M, et al. Prevalence of pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus among Sami and non-Sami men and women in Northern Norway – the SAMINOR 2 clinical survey. Int J Circumpolar Health 2018;77:1463786.
9. Blanchette V, Patry J, Brousseau-Foley M, et al. Diabetic foot complications among Indigenous peoples in Canada: a scoping review through the PROGRESS-PLUS equity lens. Front Endocrinol 2023;14:1177020.
10. Gurney JK, Stanley J, York S, et al. Risk of lower limb amputation in a national prevalent cohort of patients with diabetes. Diabetologia 2018;61:626–35.
11. Fitridge R, Chuter V, Mills J, et al. Editor’s Choice – The intersocietal IWGDF, ESVS, SVS guidelines on peripheral artery disease in people with diabetes mellitus and a foot ulcer. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023;66:454–83.

Citation

Chuter V, Charles J, Fitridge R. Delivering Equitable Access to Diabetes Foot Care Services. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2024;68:3-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.03.011.