Exploring the Risks of SGLT2i vs. DPP-4i as Add-On Therapies in Diabetes Care #Amputation #PAD #CLTI #Stent #DiabetesCare

A new study published in Diabetes Care sheds light on the comparative risks of peripheral artery disease (PAD)-related surgical events—such as amputations, stent placements, or vascular surgeries—between two classes of diabetes medications: sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4i). Conducted among U.S. veterans, this retrospective cohort study analyzed over 150,000 episodes of medication use between 2000 and 2021, linked to comprehensive health data.

Key Findings:

• SGLT2i users experienced a higher adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for PAD-related surgeries compared to DPP-4i users (aHR 1.18, 95% CI 1.08–1.29).

• This increased risk persisted even when PAD events were tracked up to 360 days after discontinuing SGLT2i therapy (aHR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06–1.26).

• The study evaluated patients with a median diabetes duration of 10 years and median HbA1c levels of 8.4%.

Implications:

While SGLT2is are often favored for their cardiovascular and renal benefits, this research highlights a potential increased risk for PAD surgical events. Clinicians must weigh these risks against the benefits when tailoring diabetes care, particularly in high-risk populations.

To read the full study, visit Diabetes Care.

How do you think these findings could shape treatment strategies for patients with advanced diabetes? Share your thoughts! #DiabetesCare #SGLT2i #DPP4i #PAD

One thought on “Exploring the Risks of SGLT2i vs. DPP-4i as Add-On Therapies in Diabetes Care #Amputation #PAD #CLTI #Stent #DiabetesCare

Add yours

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Up ↑

Discover more from DF Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Verified by MonsterInsights